What will be the total travel of this ballscrew?
Is it static or does it travel as well?


On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 01:39, Curtis Dutton <curtd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> my experiment is to use a force measuring device to proportionally control
> torque output on a servo attached to a ball screw.
>
> as a thought experiment imagine a platform hoisted by said ball screw. as
> you added weight to the platform the motor torque would increase to offset
> the weight and keep it steady. or you could set the required force equal to
> X kgs and with less than X kgs on the platform it would travel up
> proportionally. the motor would increase torque to maintain the force
> value. if more force than X the platform would travel down proportionally.
> the motor would decrease torque to maintain the set force value.
>
> in effect not a position commanded but a force commanded linear actuator.
>
> is there some othere device that would be better for this type of force
> measurement? in the 0 to about 500kg range.
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019, 11:51 AM Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > in any case, even with lower 16-bit precision, the most important part of
> > the design is the analog portion that sits between the load cell and the
> > A/D converter.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:38 AM Curtis Dutton <curtd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Chris thanks for the info.
> > >
> > > I'm not exactly certain at this point what precision I need. I'll be
> > > determining that experimentally later. I will keep in mind what you
> have
> > > said, I'll deal with it after I get my hardware running.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:17 PM Chris Albertson <
> > albertson.ch...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > If you want better than 16-bits and 1KHz then you also are going to
> > need
> > > a
> > > > very good quality analog signal conditioning and instrumentation
> > > amplifier.
> > > >   The analog circuit between the A/D converts and the load cell
> really
> > > does
> > > > matter.       You have to reject common-mode or the low bits will
> just
> > be
> > > > filled with 60Hz noise.  And you can not simply use a "brick wall"
> > filter
> > > > or you will not get the desired bandwidth through.  (If you are
> needing
> > > to
> > > > sample at 1K then you must care about 500Hz bandwidth.
> > > >
> > > > This matters a LOT more than which A/D chip you use.
> > > >
> > > > 22 bits is better than one part per million. Do you really need that?
> > It
> > > > will be hard to isolate all of the electrical and mechanical noise
> > > > especially
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:26 PM Curtis Dutton <curtd...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have a pet project I'm starting that will involve reading a load
> > cell
> > > > in
> > > > > as near as real time as possible and using that input for servo
> > > control.
> > > > >
> > > > > I plan on using mesa hardware to interface to the equipment. Does
> > > anyone
> > > > > know of a nice way to interface hotsmot2 to a load cell?
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like a fairly high resolution. 16 bit minimum, the higher
> the
> > > > > better up to 22 bit I suppose. As well as the ability to sample at
> > the
> > > > > servo thread rate of 1 Khz.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >    Curtis
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Chris Albertson
> > > > Redondo Beach, California
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Chris Albertson
> > Redondo Beach, California
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to