There is all the space I need to build an encoder for the HF mill's spindle. The sensor will fit above the drawbar.
I'm thinking of using this sensor. The shaft would point down and thesensor is aligned with an directly over the spindle. ebay.com/itm/360-600P-R-Photoelectric-Incremental-Rotary-Encoder... <https://www.ebay.com/itm/360-600P-R-Photoelectric-Incremental-Rotary-Encoder-5V-24V-AB-Two-Phases-Shaft/254214673272?hash=item3b30601378:g:AfUAAOSwQ0dcxosi> There is a cover over the spindle that is held on by friction. It looks like the top on a can of spray paint. I can make a replacement that is held on by magnets. Inside is the encoder that fits on top of the drawbar. The sensor is fitted with a 17mm "socket" that is light friction fit to the top of the drawbar. In use, I'd remove the new cover and stick it on the side of the mill using the magnet, apply the wrench to the drawbar then replace the cover. I am trying to decide if I want a 360 line or a 600 line encoder. Either will send data too fast for a printer port with no Mesa card. I might put a microcontroller in the cover and use a serial interface. The plan is to get spindle speed control to run open-loop first. I figure an open-loop servo-controlled pot is at least as accurate as a human operator can do with his fingers while listening to the noise. My pendant project got a huge boost when I figured out I don't need to build any hardware. I can use an off the shelf X-box USB game controller. I already have a few of them. On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 4:11 AM Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote: > On Friday 19 June 2020 06:10:48 Roland Jollivet wrote: > > > I was going to suggest this at the start of the thread, but I thought > > it would be considered too Heath Robinson.. > > > And within its limitation of available torque to keep the tap turning, > and an encoder able to track to a 5 degree accuracy, I see no reason to > totally eliminate rigid tapping from its abilities. Even the little 200 > watt hf mill should be able to turn an 0-80 or maybe even a 2mm tap. The > lack of space in the head to build a decent encoder is far more of a > limitation than a speed controller such as this. Thats the main reason > my little hf never grew the ability to tap, That controller/amplifier, > pulled out of the head and mounted in a 4x6x3" box so all the the hot > electronics was out of sight, proved to be a very high gain controller, > so high gain I was forced to rig an ammeter to tell me how hard it was > working so I could control the cost of fuses, there was otherwise no > slowdown to let the user know it was working too hard. > > I eventually blew that controllers pass transistor, a simple powet > F.E.T., and in search of a suitable replacement, checked the bugs in an > out of spec pc supply from the junk box, found it was rated at 800 volts > instead of 200, 12 amps instead of 2.5, but otherwise looked the same. > So the consideration resolved to the driver transistor in the circuits > ability to switch the much higher gate capacitance that bug had to have > since switching speed is paramount. I put it in, think I had a reservoir > of such bugs if it didn't work. I raised the fuse from 2.5 amps to 4. > > That was over a decade back. I've blown the fuse 2 or 3 times since with > the ammeter pegged, but its still there although the rest of the mill is > in pieces, it unscrewed one of its ballnuts a year & 1/2 ago. > > Somebody should make me an offer for it, its the complete controller out > of the big head hf x1 with a pmdx-106 interface, ready to take the pwm & > direction output of LinuxCNC from a parport bob, either manual or full > bi-directional computer control of a 200, maybe even a 400 watt motor. > Its not in service here, and probably won't ever be again as I'm > approaching the end of my ride here with a pump running at 31% > efficiency. And thats beginning to affect my giddy-up. > > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 20:40, Chris Albertson > > <albertson.ch...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > I'm making good progress on my 3D printed CNC conversion. I found a > > > way to 3D print a spindle controller that should work for most small > > > milling machines and small lathes. The cost is "almost nothing". > > > These machines' spindles are controlled by turning a potentiometer > > > so my new system simply uses a cheap model airplane servo to turn > > > the shaft of a potentiometer. The computer is 100% isolated from > > > any high voltage or noise. > > > > > > These small mills will never be able to do things like rigid tapping > > > so all they need is a simple and approximate way to control the RPM. > > > This speed control can be run "open loop" if plus/minus 20% is good > > > enough or used with a spindle encoder in a closed PID loop as long > > > as the PID is tunned not to aggressively. > > > > > > > > > For anyone who does not know about these hobby servos: > > > > > > - They are not full rotation motors. They turn only through > > > about 250 degrees, This is a good match to the pot as pots also > > > rotate about this range. > > > - The angle of the servo shaft is controlled by a PWM signal. > > > - They are "dirt cheap" starting at about $5 > > > amazon.com/4-Pack-MG996R < > > > https://www.amazon.com/4-Pack-MG996R-Torque-Digital-Helicopter/dp/B0 > > >7MFK266B/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&keywords=mg+servo&qid=1592502600&sr=8-2 > > > > > > - They accept a 5-volt control signal, so they have a built-in > > > computer interface. > > > - They are fast (enough) and can move from full-low to full-high > > > on 0.6 seconds > > > - They really are actual "servos" and have an encoder, motor > > > driver, and gears all inside. > > > > > > > > > So when LinuxCNC outputs a low-value PWM spindle control, the servo > > > moves the pot to the low position. As the PWM signal value gets > > > larger the pot is moved closer to the high-speed position. > > > > > > In the picture below is a cartoonish render. The green frame is > > > one-piece 3D printed, The red pannel and tan coupler are also 3D > > > printed. The motor sells on Amazon, four units for $20 and the pot > > > is about a buck each. Four M4 button head screws everything > > > together. > > > > > > Here is a link to the current version CAD files and a viewer. I'll > > > be updating the files after the first prototype is printed. > > > https://a360.co/2N95AiL > > > I may make a top cover to protect the pot and keep fingers off the > > > high voltage. > > > > > > > > > > > > [image: Red Neck Spindle Control v6.jpg] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Chris Albertson > > > Redondo Beach, California > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Emc-users mailing list > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-users mailing list > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > Cheers, Gene Heskett > -- > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > -Ed Howdershelt (Author) > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. > - Louis D. Brandeis > Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
