I hate to point this out, but this response appears to be a violation of the
CoC.
Scott(still working on the smiley face thing)
On Wednesday, June 30, 2021, 10:42:15 AM CDT, Valerio Bellizzomi
<vale...@selnet.org> wrote:
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 17:30 +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> Anno domini 2021 Wed, 30 Jun 17:21:08 +0200
> Valerio Bellizzomi scripsit:
> > On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 16:14 +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> > > Anno domini 2021 Wed, 30 Jun 16:04:47 +0200
> > > Valerio Bellizzomi scripsit:
> > > > On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 15:46 +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> > > > > Anno domini 2021 Wed, 30 Jun 15:41:13 +0200
> > > > > Valerio Bellizzomi scripsit:
> > > > > > On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 09:29 -0400, Mark Wendt wrote:
> > > > > > > We still have not heard any reason(s) as to the necessity
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > having a
> > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > of conduct for this list.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mark
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In my organization I have established codes of conduct and
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > seems
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > be a winning choice for everybody, no one here is concerned
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > being
> > > > > > controlled or enforced, they know that codes are a
> > > > > > necessary
> > > > > > thing
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > an organization to be successful in the long term and vis-
> > > > > > a-vis
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > bigger and broader organizations with which we might
> > > > > > interact.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you do not want to control or enforce it, then just drop
> > > > > it.
> > > > > CoC
> > > > > either has an agenda or it is better droped.
> > > >
> > > > It is my organization and I do what I want here. Thank you.
> > > >
> > > > I wonder with what right you allow yourself to comment since
> > > > you do
> > > > not
> > > > and will never be part of my organization.
> > >
> > > Oh cool. Then can I assume the CoC nonsens of your organisation
> > > will
> > > not be forced on this organisation (or mailinglist or forum or
> > > whatever you might call it)? Because it is, then there's an
> > > agenda we
> > > should talk about in public.
> > >
> > > Nik
> >
> > 1)
> > https://www.selroc.systems/forum/general-information/questions-and-answers/72-official-code-of-ethics-and-professional-conduct
> >
> > 2)
> > https://www.selroc.systems/forum/general-information/questions-and-answers/246-the-quality-of-this-forum
> >
> > 3)
> > https://www.selroc.systems/forum/general-information/questions-and-answers/185-why-choose-selroc-systems
>
> So your forum has 139 postings in total, but several pages CoC. Of
> course the CoC did attract a lot of people to participate, didn't it?
>
> Nik
You can't understand what you read, that defect is called functional
illiteracy.
On
https://www.selroc.systems/forum/general-information/questions-and-answers/246-the-quality-of-this-forum
:
"This is sensed to be a small professional quality forum. The posts
written here should always follow the rules written here
https://www.selroc.systems/forum/gen...sional-conduct";
i.e. This means I admit to the forum only people I know and trust.
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
