Could someone please point out why this COC is even an issue?
If we already agreed to some terms, why is a COC being layered on top
of that?
Seeing people pack their bags over a proposal, seems like a bad idea.
The argument that no professional organizations or people will be
attracted to a project without a COC is nonsense.
History tells a much different story.
How many commercial products have grabbed LCNC code ?? Quite a few!
I do not understand why anyone spent time writing a COC ??
This list has been quite civilized for a very long time.
Dave
On 7/12/2021 1:15 PM, Les Newell wrote:
You do know you agreed to a much more restrictive CoC when you joined
this mailing list, don't you? Here is the full agreement:
<https://slashdotmedia.com/terms-of-use>
This is linked from the EMC-users subscription form
<https://sourceforge.net/projects/emc/lists/emc-users>
If you agreed to that, why are you so stressed about the one Jeff
proposed? If you don't agree you'd best unsubscribe quickly before it
upsets you.
Les
On 12/07/2021 09:03, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
You don't realise that forcing CoC on others is exactly what's the
problem with CoC. Just drop that f****ing CoC nonsens and everythings
going to be civilized again. But I see, this won't happen. That's the
whole point of forcing CoC: faschism.
Nik
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
