Hi Warren, MSC
On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 21:03:23 UTC+10, Warren Seine wrote:
>
> Regarding the documentation content, here's what I would suggest:
>
> - clean up the demo list
> - separate demos from tools / engines / libraries (it's somehow
> confusing right now)
>
> At this point they are all demos, in the sense that they demonstrate C++
code that was ported using emscripten. We could separate them, but what
would you group them as (they would not be helpful top level headings).
Some options:
a) Rename "Demos" to "Emscripten-ported C++ code" to make it clear that
some of these are tools and frameworks.
b) Just have good graphical demo examples here (e.g. the games section).
Move the other examples to their own wiki page and link from the bottom of
the demos section.
>
> - update the demo list with direct link to the code (if available) and
> the actual demo
> - format it as a table ("name", "description",
> "author", "submission date", "demo link", "source code")I
>
>
I have formatted the list in a table as suggested. I made the name into a
link, so perhaps should remove the "demo link" heading?
Is it worth having a "version" column for the Emscripten version?
At this point my tidying the table further is not a priority. If anyone
wishes to take on this task or add the missing information, please be my
guest.
Thanks
Hamish
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
