On Monday, June 30, 2014 2:04:57 PM UTC+2, Hamish Willee wrote:
>
> Hi Warren, MSC
>
Hi Hamish, thanks for the update!
On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 21:03:23 UTC+10, Warren Seine wrote:
>>
>> Regarding the documentation content, here's what I would suggest:
>>
>> - clean up the demo list
>> - separate demos from tools / engines / libraries (it's somehow
>> confusing right now)
>>
>> At this point they are all demos, in the sense that they demonstrate C++
> code that was ported using emscripten.
>
My idea here was to separate the "wow effect" initiatives from
emscripten-compatible C++ libraries. The first one is mostly to see what
can be done. The second one has to avoid starting from scratch when porting
code to HTML5. On the list, I can see Cocos2D, Box2D.js, Minko (disclaimer:
I work for Aerys, the company behind Minko), Esenthel, Oryol, lzma.js,
sql.js, all projects in the Programming Languages part...
Also, several links are broken (TeX), not relevant (Text-to-Speak) or even
*spam* (OpenJPEG).
> We could separate them, but what would you group them as (they would not
> be helpful top level headings). Some options:
> a) Rename "Demos" to "Emscripten-ported C++ code" to make it clear that
> some of these are tools and frameworks.
>
Pretty much everything would be "Emscripten-ported code". But considering
my point above, not everything is a demo. Some are toolkits (de facto a
demo, but re-usable).
> b) Just have good graphical demo examples here (e.g. the games section).
> Move the other examples to their own wiki page and link from the bottom of
> the demos section.
>
Yes, only keep up-to-date, amazing demos.
>
>> - update the demo list with direct link to the code (if available)
>> and the actual demo
>> - format it as a table ("name", "description",
>> "author", "submission date", "demo link", "source code")I
>>
>>
> I have formatted the list in a table as suggested. I made the name into a
> link, so perhaps should remove the "demo link" heading?
>
Yes.
> Is it worth having a "version" column for the Emscripten version?
>
Not IMHO. And it will be hard to collect.
> At this point my tidying the table further is not a priority. If anyone
> wishes to take on this task or add the missing information, please be my
> guest.
>
Ok.
> Thanks
> Hamish
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
