We had 4 responses on the list, in addition to the discussion at IETF.
Q1: 4 yes
0 No
Q2: 3 EAP-FASTv2
1 EAP-TEAM
The WG consensus is that EAP-FASTv2 should be the tunnel method.
Alan DeKok wrote:
> For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer
> the following consensus call:
>
> Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled method?
>
> Please indicate Yes or No.
>
> Question 2: If the answer to Question 1 is "Yes", please indicate
> support for one of the two proposed methods:
>
> FASTv2
> or
> EAP-Team
>
...
> Thursday April 14. That gives us 2 weeks, which is usual for a
> consensus call.
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
