-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/16/2011 2:21 AM, Stephen Hanna wrote: > I agree with Katrin's count for the email poll. When combined > with the count from the meeting in Prague (since Alan asked > for only folks who didn't attend the EMU WG meeting in Prague),
Based upon a policy that was AFAICT created out of thin air by Bernard, who has AFAICT zero official status in emu (but, OTOH, _has_ evinced the ability to count). > I think the total is 12 for EAP-FASTv2 and 5 for EAP-TEAM. > > Thanks, > > Steve > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37 >> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 10:10 AM >> To: Alan DeKok; emu@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method >> >> I counted five responses: >> >> Q1: 5 yes >> 0 no >> >> Q2: 3 EAP-FASTv2 >> 2 EAP-TEAM >> >> Katrin >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Alan >>> DeKok >>> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:55 AM >>> To: emu@ietf.org >>> Subject: Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method >>> >>> >>> We had 4 responses on the list, in addition to the discussion at >> IETF. >>> >>> Q1: 4 yes >>> 0 No >>> >>> Q2: 3 EAP-FASTv2 >>> 1 EAP-TEAM >>> >>> The WG consensus is that EAP-FASTv2 should be the tunnel method. >>> >>> Alan DeKok wrote: >>>> For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer >>>> the following consensus call: >>>> >>>> Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled >> method? >>>> >>>> Please indicate Yes or No. >>>> >>>> Question 2: If the answer to Question 1 is "Yes", please indicate >>>> support for one of the two proposed methods: >>>> >>>> FASTv2 >>>> or >>>> EAP-Team >>>> >>> ... >>>> Thursday April 14. That gives us 2 weeks, which is usual for a >>>> consensus call. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Emu mailing list >>> Emu@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu >> _______________________________________________ >> Emu mailing list >> Emu@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNq9XAAAoJEG4XtfZZU7RfuakIAKYsdDLjBfsXkdKQCRQvSxq1 EPYOwruobMBLH3kXUdHJKFkJXsTAkkFXsHl2wa2KpiTyyG1VEpLC7SmQdvZjA2T2 bOmSc4N1e9Kks4oSzh/+zN1Js07T252mnhN+lBEyu+HjcAHtsaCgcw0ZqAM3O+3l Fy1EKp8ZyUmQ18+Q8E9cWpr5cTHlMJxBXW4szDjsQHDHiQoFM0VA2esTdOzYgdzb ps2zH2k4Qkw4MwFizxxCpbw2w8nmeLHrQu46QlXi/zwCdOVcxqkTVw+XMbrEW5Vv /o1BqmlHXfdbxrVX8yIQBjab8gOgO/jmrrTTF/0MIX7hQrT79kCTynjEG/gja/U= =iRgo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<attachment: gwz.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
