On 4/15/2011 11:41 PM, Dan Harkins wrote:
> 
>   Rough consensus people, rough consensus. 

???  If you're going to go to the trouble of publishing a vote count,
you might at least try to make it accurate.

> How about if our esteemed
> co-chairmen go behind closed doors and burn some paper. White smoke
> means TEAM, black smoke means FAST.
> 
>   Dan.
> 
> On Fri, April 15, 2011 7:10 am, Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37 wrote:
>> I counted five responses:
>>
>> Q1: 5 yes
>> 0 no
>>
>> Q2: 3 EAP-FASTv2
>> 2 EAP-TEAM
>>
>> Katrin
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Alan
>>> DeKok
>>> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:55 AM
>>> To: emu@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method
>>>
>>>
>>>   We had 4 responses on the list, in addition to the discussion at
>> IETF.
>>>
>>> Q1: 4 yes
>>>     0 No
>>>
>>> Q2: 3 EAP-FASTv2
>>>     1 EAP-TEAM
>>>
>>>   The WG consensus is that EAP-FASTv2 should be the tunnel method.
>>>
>>> Alan DeKok wrote:
>>>> For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer
>>>> the following consensus call:
>>>>
>>>> Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled
>> method?
>>>>
>>>>  Please indicate Yes or No.
>>>>
>>>> Question 2: If the answer to Question 1 is "Yes", please indicate
>>>> support for one of the two proposed methods:
>>>>
>>>>        FASTv2
>>>> or
>>>>        EAP-Team
>>>>
>>> ...
>>>>   Thursday April 14.  That gives us 2 weeks, which is usual for a
>>>> consensus call.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emu mailing list
>>> Emu@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emu mailing list
>> Emu@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
> 
> 

<<attachment: gwz.vcf>>

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to