On 4/18/11 2:10 AM, Glen Zorn wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 4/16/2011 2:21 AM, Stephen Hanna wrote:
I agree with Katrin's count for the email poll. When combined
with the count from the meeting in Prague (since Alan asked
for only folks who didn't attend the EMU WG meeting in Prague),
Based upon a policy that was AFAICT created out of thin air by Bernard,
who has AFAICT zero official status in emu (but, OTOH, _has_ evinced the
ability to count).
I asked Bernard to be at the front of the room for this part of the
session because Joe was involved in one of the proposals and Alan
couldn't be there to do the "count". I guess maybe we could have people
call out their names one by one and Alan could have done the count, but
having somebody there in person seemed like a good way to go.
spt
I think the total is 12 for EAP-FASTv2 and 5 for EAP-TEAM.
Thanks,
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 10:10 AM
To: Alan DeKok; emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method
I counted five responses:
Q1: 5 yes
0 no
Q2: 3 EAP-FASTv2
2 EAP-TEAM
Katrin
-----Original Message-----
From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Alan
DeKok
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:55 AM
To: emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method
We had 4 responses on the list, in addition to the discussion at
IETF.
Q1: 4 yes
0 No
Q2: 3 EAP-FASTv2
1 EAP-TEAM
The WG consensus is that EAP-FASTv2 should be the tunnel method.
Alan DeKok wrote:
For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer
the following consensus call:
Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled
method?
Please indicate Yes or No.
Question 2: If the answer to Question 1 is "Yes", please indicate
support for one of the two proposed methods:
FASTv2
or
EAP-Team
...
Thursday April 14. That gives us 2 weeks, which is usual for a
consensus call.
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNq9XAAAoJEG4XtfZZU7RfuakIAKYsdDLjBfsXkdKQCRQvSxq1
EPYOwruobMBLH3kXUdHJKFkJXsTAkkFXsHl2wa2KpiTyyG1VEpLC7SmQdvZjA2T2
bOmSc4N1e9Kks4oSzh/+zN1Js07T252mnhN+lBEyu+HjcAHtsaCgcw0ZqAM3O+3l
Fy1EKp8ZyUmQ18+Q8E9cWpr5cTHlMJxBXW4szDjsQHDHiQoFM0VA2esTdOzYgdzb
ps2zH2k4Qkw4MwFizxxCpbw2w8nmeLHrQu46QlXi/zwCdOVcxqkTVw+XMbrEW5Vv
/o1BqmlHXfdbxrVX8yIQBjab8gOgO/jmrrTTF/0MIX7hQrT79kCTynjEG/gja/U=
=iRgo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
