On Monday, 17 March 2003, at 15:26:53 (-0800),
Robert G. Werner wrote:

> Actually, I think it still builds against freetype 1, as you
> indicated but it is able to handle the include files the way RH lays
> them out (is it RH that does this or the FT2 lib?).  E.16.5 can't
> find the right include file but there is an SRPM out that can.  This
> is probably what you are refering to in CVS.

RPM's/SRPM's for E-related goop are best downloaded from:

http://vermillion.nplus1.net/7.3.1/

> Also, another can of worms entirely, but has anyone ever had any
> luck tracking down the remember bug with eeplets?

AFAIK, there isn't one.  It's more a question of whether or not they
were built properly, and who's doing the session managing.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "I always wait until a jury has spoken before I anticipate what they
  will do."                          -- US Attorney General Janet Reno


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to