On Friday, 21 March 2003, at 11:19:54 (-0500), Hall Stevenson wrote: > I'll bet that none of the primary developers are interested in doing > this as they're busy with e17. Even if you volunteer and do a good > job, they may not want to update the "old" version now. > > I'm curious what Rasterman or Jennings' response will be...
I have no plans to write such a patch myself, but were someone else to do it, and if it worked, I see no reason why it couldn't go into CVS. As I said to Kim the other day, 0.16.x will be the end-user choice for some time to come. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Many things in life are highly overrated. Chief among them is love. No matter what anyone else tells you, nice guys do finish last. -- Rules of Life #96 and #97 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
