On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:49:01 +0000 Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> said:
> Wow, what happened in > https://git.enlightenment.org/website/www.git/commit/?id=9f75e7370f168ada24267d6c065a9cbba92ee42f? > We're all monochrome now :( well i was doing the contrast thing. increasing it. > a { > - color: #44aaff; > + color: #eeeeee; > } > > Pretty sure the comment about link colours was that clicked vs unclicked > should be more differerent - no need to lose the nice blues completely. > Looking at the site now it's lost most of it's character. > > Also, since we have source control, why are we leaving old code commented > out? > > - text-shadow: 0px 0px 10px rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5); > + text-shadow: none; > +// text-shadow: 0px 0px 10px rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5); i like doing this for things i might undo later or refer to. > Andy > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 at 02:33 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:38:05 +0000 jaquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net> > > said: > > > > > Hi guys this is something I can contribute to in terms of website. and I > > > can even host it if you all so desire. Question is do you want this > > > built off a framework, such as wordpress where it will be easy to > > > include a forums section or something custom built? > > > > We don't need hosting. We have that. We have a framework: Dokuwiki. Our > > content > > depends on it and its markdown. It also has discussion forums too. They are > > activated on several pages. > > > > This discussion is really about styling and maybe layout. > > > > > On 2017-11-16 22:26, Stephen Houston wrote: > > > > +1 I've been saying we need a new website bad. And one that is sleek, > > > > modern, and yes white. Time to look up to date and kept with the > > > > times. > > > > You will notice nearly every major linux distribution and nearly all > > > > major > > > > linux software websites are in the confines of what you describe. > > > > Simple, > > > > flat, white background and black text, sharp but small images that are > > > > mostly subtle, and responsive design to look good across devices. The > > > > reason being that this is proven to be the easiest on the eyes and the > > > > most > > > > pleasing to the reader as you said. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017, 3:58 PM Cedric Bail <ced...@ddlm.me> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> As some of you may have noticed we are doing some improvement to our > > > >> documentation and trying to get things easier when starting with EFL. > > > >> One > > > >> of the main issue we are facing is that our website is definitively > > > >> hard to > > > >> read for a lot of people. So Paul went on trying to figure out why. > > > >> > > > >> The first problem is actually the constrast ratio between background > > > >> and > > > >> text. According to W3C accessibility guidelines ( > > > >> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#contrast-minimum )it should be 4.5:1 at > > > >> least. Our colors are #818181 for the text and #303030 which give a > > > >> contrast ratio of 3.39:1 ( > > > >> https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ > > > >> ). And it is worth for people with vision impairment where it should > > > >> be 7:1. > > > >> > > > >> Black on white or white on black would work, but according to some > > > >> random > > > >> person on Internet (could not find a scientific evidence/citation of > > > >> it) a > > > >> white background force your pupils to contracts, making it easier to > > > >> focus > > > >> your eye with a smaller pupil (much like the depth of field is > > > >> increased > > > >> with a smaller camera lens). This could be shown by a test carried on > > > >> 136 > > > >> subject, where the people reading black text on a white background > > > >> scored > > > >> better than any other combination of colors ( > > > >> http://lite.mst.edu/media/research/ctel/documents/LITE-2003-04.pdf ). > > > >> > > > >> The second problem are our links that are difficult to tell wether > > > >> they > > > >> have been clicked on or not. Also they have a slight glow around the > > > >> links > > > >> that makes them harder to read. The best link on the subject we can > > > >> point > > > >> to would be > > > >> https://www.nngroup.com/articles/guidelines-for-visualizing-links/ . > > > >> > > > >> So it would be best to come up with a more accessible design for our > > > >> web > > > >> site. If someone want to suggest a new design within those constraint, > > > >> it > > > >> would be great, but I would suggest to look at > > > >> https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/documentation/ or at > > > >> http://doc.qt.io/ > > > >> . They are simple and work well in term of readability. We could > > > >> easily go > > > >> with something like that. What do you think ? > > > >> > > > >> Cedric > > > >> > > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > > >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> enlightenment-devel mailing list > > > >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > > > > > > > -- > > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- > > Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > _______________________________________________ > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > -- > http://andywilliams.me > http://ajwillia.ms > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
