On Sunday, 30 September 2007, at 16:04:54 (+0200), Vincent Torri wrote: > Since I try to port the efl on windows, I've run into some problems with > autofoo (strange, isn't it ?). I've looked a bit at autoconf and libtool > doc, and I think that configure.in scripts can be improved a bit. > > Here is what I propose. Feel free to tell me if my proposals are not > correct. > > ... > > Ideas ? remarks ?
Most of that sounds fine, but why not provide us with a sample configure.in with examples of all 5 changes made to it so we can get a more concrete idea of what you're wanting to do? Then if people have any specific objections, they're easier to note. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "I am the one and only; nobody I'd rather be. I am the one and only. You can't take that away from me." -- Chesney Hawkes ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
