On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote: > > exactly ... where we can unify these pieces without touching common code > > the better. not sure if there's a "core" piece of e17 where we can move > > all of this, but if we had a few files that we could just drop into the > > different e libraries, that'd be a good start i think (think gnulib > > here). > > I've tried to use gnulib once, for the port of the linux functions. It's a > pain to install and to use. I'll never touch that beast anymore :)
it can be a beast, that's for sure. i'm not advocating the complexity there, just the idea: little chunks of .c/.h you can drop in and run with. since we seem to be on the same track now, if you want to revert the changes i made wrt windows.h/winsock2.h, feel free ... the other (non-windows) headers should stay the same of course though. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
