On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> I've tried to use gnulib once, for the port of the linux functions. It's a >> pain to install and to use. I'll never touch that beast anymore :) > > it can be a beast, that's for sure. i'm not advocating the complexity there, > just the idea: little chunks of .c/.h you can drop in and run with. > > since we seem to be on the same track now, if you want to revert the changes i > made wrt windows.h/winsock2.h, feel free ... the other (non-windows) headers > should stay the same of course though. i'm writing an e_win32 (or efl_win32 ?) lib that ports some functions mostly fcntl, mmap, symlink, pipe and utility functions I use here and there). I'll revert the changes when I use that lib. I'm just wondering if should name the functions like the unix ones, or with an e_ prefix. If the latter, that would mean modifying the source code and do some defines for the unix calls. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
