Massimiliano wrote:
> 2008/3/20, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Ah, good man. You've been thoroughly indoctrinated into
>> avoiding the evil influences of 'dependencies' in 'E', now it's
>> even for e17 modules!
>>
>> Indeed, I wonder how many systems e17 is going to run on
>> that have absolutely no trace of any use of xml on them, or that
>> don't already have libxml2 installed.
>> So, instead, "e" should have everyone who needs to parse xml
>> write their own.. again, and again,... Far better that way.
>>
>>
>
> Hmmm, i think that there'a a lack of understanding. The module i wrote
> isn't a module like start or wlan or news, it doesn't reside on
> e_modules/ dir, but you can find it into
> e17/apps/e/src/modules/conf_wallpaper, hence my desire to avoid
> external dependencies.
>
>
Look, I personally think it's great that you've done all
this - it's a great exercise and a cool and useful feature, and
you should be free to choose to do it in whatever way you deem
best. :)
But I hope you realize that it's just not a reasonable
solution to the general issue of "dealing with xml in e" - and
that's what we're pointing to here. Indeed, I believe that's why
someone(s) wrote libxml2 in the first place (perhaps someone much
like you), to address such an issue for the benefit of others.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
