On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:19:39 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:21:35 +0100 "Massimiliano Calamelli" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > > > 2008/3/21, Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > Why not just use libxml2 and make the wallpaper_web part optional if > > > > the user has libxml2? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > > > I agree, and your idea already are in TODO list, but i don't started > > > with it for some reasons. > > > The module is a testbed to see how online stuffs can be improve E's > > > life, so imho I have to work to make it usable without problems; after > > > do that, and after seeing what people think about, we can start with > > > another external application that get online stuffs for themes, icons, > > > wallpapers, cursors, etc. This kind of app must have a solid backend > > > library to use to get/put online contents, built by > > > libxmle/exml/whatever. > > > Atm i prefer to work to make my module useful instead of change the > > > parser to use another library (that i've to study), having in mind > > > that there's an entry for this kind of lib in GSoC ideas page. > > > > maybe it's just me, but as we control both the server-side AND the app - > > do we NEED to use XML and RSS feeds? why do we need to make a complicated > > format to parse where we are arguing over adding libraries just to parse > > it, when we COULD simplify it to a VERY simple format. eg: > > > > (get http://www.get-e.org/e-feeds/wallpapers.feed) > > result: > > > > -ITEM- > > Name: The name of the item > > Updated: 2432215534 > > Thumb: wallpapers/thumbs/blah.png > > File: wallpapers/files/blah.edj > > -ITEM- > > Name: Another item > > ... > > > > (thumb and file paths are relative to http://www.get-e.org/e-feeds/ - i.e. > > the dir the .feed file is in, Updated is just a timestamp in seconds since > > jan 1 1970). > > > > this would be brain-dead simple to parse, to generate etc. > > > > just a suggestion - but i just think there is a lot of debate and work > > when we can SAVE effort by just thinking simple. > > HINT: return eet/edje files ;-) > > Let's push the use, it's good, it's great... that's great - but u'd need the php to generate them... - thus why i just suggested a simpler text format :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
