On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 01:40:37PM +0800, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:12:21 +1000 Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > >From reading Raster's comments, I gleen that the idea is basically to > > leave the debian/ directroes in CVS, generally speaking containing > > a changelog.in but no changelog. And not distributing the debian/ > > directory in the tarball. > > > > For my own usage (sporadic as it is), this is fine. It would just be an > > incredible choore to have to go and recreate all the debian/ directories > > by hand. But if the data is in CVS, thats fine. Presumably there aren't > > any objections to making (minor) modifications to it such as fixing up > > build dependancies. > > no objections - as long as it doesnt get into dist tarballs - the debian guys > are happy :)
Understood. -- Horms ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
