On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200), > Albin Tonnerre wrote: > > > Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a > > build failure when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as > > the debian dir is not included in them (on purpose) > > I still think this is a huge mistake. It's a very simple matter for > someone who doesn't want to use it to "rm -rf" a debian/ hierarchy > that is already there. > > It's a hell of a lot harder for someone who *does* want to use it to > reproduce it out of thin air.
I agree with that. Nevertheless, the base directory should be free of Debian files or references to them (especially ./Makefile.am and ./configure.in) as that breaks make distcheck for packagers which use different debian directories as Albin mentioned before. If the base directory is kept clean, creating ./debian/changelog from ./debian/changelog.in is as simple as adding it to configure.in manually, if needed. Falko ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
