On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:57:20 +1000 Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:35:22PM -0700, Michael Jennings wrote: > > On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200), > > Albin Tonnerre wrote: > > > > > Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a > > > build failure when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as > > > the debian dir is not included in them (on purpose) > > > > I still think this is a huge mistake. It's a very simple matter for > > someone who doesn't want to use it to "rm -rf" a debian/ hierarchy > > that is already there. > > > > It's a hell of a lot harder for someone who *does* want to use it to > > reproduce it out of thin air. > > First, up sorry for the bother. I didn't realise that there > was a new way to handle the Debian packaging wafting through > the archive. > > Secondly, perhaps it would be better to improve the packaging, > incoporating those changes being made by people maintaining pacakages > for Debian, rather than delete it all together. > > Its seems to me that being able to check out code from cvs and build a > debian package would be useful to some people. But perhaps I am the only > person in that category :-) oh we don't delete - we just dont include it in the dist tarballs - so not in configure.in/makefile.am, but otherwise in cvs is fine. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
