Jose Gonzalez wrote: > Carsten wrote: > > >> ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license is not a >> reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss anyway. >> we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate. >> >> >> > > That's no doubt true as a rule on any given project, but statistics > show that gpl/lgpl code and developers outnumber bsd ones by orders of > magnitude. Your feelings on it are a bit subjective, and so might those of > others who prefer some other license, but that's a fact that should be > recognized, not a squabble. >
Anyone who paid attention in class would know that correlation != causation. Quit making assumptions. > > >> here's how it will go: >> >> 1. existing libs. the LGPL crowd - RESPECT the licenses already used. deal >> with it. the original authors chose the licenses. don't like it? go somewhere >> else. this is what pretty much every oss project will say - except for very >> small ones. >> >> 2. new libs. he who writes and licenses the lib initially makes the license >> call. if its LGPL or BSD - doesn't matter. but RESPECT their choice. just >> like >> they need to RESPECT the choices of existing libs and stop trying to change >> them. >> >> >> > No one proposing either licensing their work as lgpl, or even just > asking > for other's views on a possible change, has disrespected any author -- not as > far > as I can see. > > > >> 3. new apps. same as libs - choose your license. BEWARE of GPL though. you >> CANNOT take the GPL code and put it into an LGPL lib - so if you see code >> going >> from app back to a lib sometime... think many times before GPL. licence the >> APP >> under LGPL - it'd be effectively the same. >> >> 4. linking TO LGPL libs is ok - we do it already anyway. >> >> 5. linking to GPL libs - be WARY. very. this makes your lib GPL and then any >> app using that lib GPL. beware of the chain of "infection". if you want it a >> core lib used by everyone - chances are this is a very bad idea. >> >> i'm a little tired of the divisive political debating here. this is NOT a >> technical argument. it id not something u can win by benchmarking, numbers >> and >> proof. it's all emotions, speculation and politics. please take your politics >> elsewhere as this is the one thing that is really going to destroy this >> community if anything. i know i am personally ->||<- this far from saying >> "fuck >> it - i'm out. if this is becoming a political playground i have better things >> to do that deal with it". >> >> now. make your choices. but enough of the politics. >> >> debate is healthy - technical debate. direction for features and code and >> technical stuff. we can always debate. its good. politics is nothing more >> than >> a way to divide and create little power encampments "us" and "them". >> >> i have been very quiet - i was hoping people would sort their difference out >> quietly, but it seems i need to say something. i think i have been very >> reasonable here and have tried to accommodate BOTH sides. i see the arguments >> for LGPL etc. and i know why. i respect the desire for it - and when it is >> appropriate and sane/possible - if the author(s) want to use it, do so. by >> the >> same token respect the licenses there already. if 1 author for a project says >> "no - i wont relicence" or 1 authors alone simply never responds, it doesnt >> get >> relicenced. in fact the debate and effort spent relicencing is a big waste of >> >> > > Again, no one tried to force or impose changing any existing license > on a project agaisnt anyone's wishes... some did ask, but that's neither > disrespect nor intolerance. But also note that bsd does explicitly champion > the right to relicense the code.. that's part of the very thing many have > defended here as their reason for choosing such a license. > > > >> time. so again - there are 2 valid sides to this. respect EACHOTHER. >> >> > > Indeed, well said. > > > >> thanks. :) >> >> now... do we have productive stuff to do? >> >> > > Argue some more, call each other names.. then go out for a beer > or reasonably priced meal? > :) > Define reasonably priced? I'll settle for nothing less then $100 a seat :P > > ____________________________________________________________ > Get expert advice on your inheritance. Click here for more information. > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3mKSlbQcijuE1TAn7oNNAdEmnu0QMIdoRYMEPtpWYi7t4Xbm/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
