(CC'ing enlightenment-devel again)

On Wednesday 15 December 2010 06:32:18 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> Em 15-12-2010 03:34, Raphael Kubo da Costa escreveu:
> > Doesn't it make more sense to unconditionally set at least
> > CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE in this function (if data == NULL, set it to 0)?
> 
> OK, thanks for the rest.
> 
> I don't think this would be good because url_send() seems to distinguish
> a GET from a POST based on data not being NULL.
> 
> For a "new-style retweet" I have to do a POST to an URL without postargs.
> 
> Rui

At this point, I think we can't change the url_send()'s API anymore. If you 
keep the its code as-is, does it work for you? I had the impression it wasn't 
working properly.

-- 
Raphael Kubo da Costa
ProFUSION embedded systems
http://profusion.mobi

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to