Em 15-12-2010 14:32, Raphael Kubo da Costa escreveu: > (CC'ing enlightenment-devel again) > > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 06:32:18 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: >> Em 15-12-2010 03:34, Raphael Kubo da Costa escreveu: >>> Doesn't it make more sense to unconditionally set at least >>> CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE in this function (if data == NULL, set it to 0)? >> >> OK, thanks for the rest. >> >> I don't think this would be good because url_send() seems to distinguish >> a GET from a POST based on data not being NULL. >> >> For a "new-style retweet" I have to do a POST to an URL without postargs. >> >> Rui > > At this point, I think we can't change the url_send()'s API anymore. If you > keep the its code as-is, does it work for you? I had the impression it wasn't > working properly.
No, it's not working properly either way but it's on the internal ecore_con_url_perform() that's failing. Anyway, even if useless (I agree) my change wouldn't alter the API (that's a no*no right now). Rui ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
