On Saturday, November 5, 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz <m...@zentific.com> wrote: > On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 23:12:21 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 09:47:08 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz <m...@zentific.com> said: >> >> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 22:31:01 +0900 >> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: >> > >> > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 10:34:31 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> > > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said: >> > > >> > > > I wonder if this should go in few days before the freeze. Really, let's >> > > > put such a big thing in a branch and let it mature for a while, merging >> > > > into trunk after 1.1 is released. >> > > >> > > this thing has been going on for months. you just didnt see the previous >> > > patches i got. >> > erm without favoring one way or another, if WE haven't seen anything until >> > just now then why would it matter how long "this thing" has been going on >> > for? >> >> you were favored with some ecore_con rewriting just before 1.0... :) > that was in order to fix a huge number of bugs, not add a giant api. >> >> you're going to have to trust me then. the code is pretty much dormant unless >> the feature is used. as such i've given it much more testing than the people >> who wrote it and spent basically 2 solid says worth of work making it go from >> barely limping to actually working reliably. we have 2 more weeks of bug >> fixing to iron out the bugs. >> >> right now as best i know (please. i'd love to have other people who know this >> around), i'm the one with probably the most experience with audio. i spent >> several years as a teenager composing audio tunes via mod trackers. i have a >> decent understanding of what sequencing, tracking and sample manipulation are >> about - i am far from an expert at things like mp3/vorbis audio codec, but i >> do know the principles. if there is a problem in the api design (which is all >> in edc - and its right now a tiny partial implementation of my requirements, >> there is more to come) then i'd love to have people other than me know enough >> about audio, mixing, sequencing etc. to actually say something. speak up if u >> think u have audio under your belt. but as best i know, no-one has indicated >> they know this to date. :( so i guess as the for-no-defacto-audio-guy... i >> say this is good as it has, api-wise, followed the spec i gave prince & >> govind - in its subset implementation. if there are bugs - they can be fixed. >> still have 2 more weeks of bugfixing. that's WHY there is a separate merge >> window vs freeze window. :) > seems reasonable enough I suppose. would still be nice if giant patches like > this could get brought in more than a couple days before the merge > window...maybe some sort of samsung policy
Also, split patches for easier review. Okay, none of us may be as expert in audio as raster, but very small part is about it. In a way, we can act as users of the API in the review, also reviewing all the other bits. But as is the patch is a major dump that would be rejected by us and every other projects. I hope raster understands our points. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
