On 03/09/13 15:44, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > Just to be clear, my position was never that I disagreed with this API, it > was that I disagreed with the fact that it was now able to be added, without > discussion and even after previous iterations of it were removed with the > blanket statement of THIS IS BAD AND WE'RE NOT DOING IT. > > I think it's a useful thing to have, though imo the primary use case is to > get the geometry, a specific call for which would also lead to far fewer bugs > as a result of frequent item deletion.
My position is divided to two: 1. The way it was put in. 2. The lack of good reasoning behind adding it. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
