On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:52:33 +1030 Simon Lees <sfl...@suse.de> said: > > > On 01/17/2017 12:30 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > Hi Raster, > > > > - waf/meson/jam and I'd add http://gittup.org/tup/: all look nice, > > but I have not much experience. Not that much used and seems to only > > cover a subset as well. (tup is nice since they can run an > > inotify-based daemon that monitors for changed files... which helps *a > > lot*). > > > > How many major distro's are shipping these out of the box? we don't > really want to add another hurdle to users building by needing to > manually install a build system first, we also don't want to add a > hurdle to distro packagers in needing to package a new build system just > to package efl (most distro's will require the build system to be packaged).
also windows FWIW. > > > > I'd *NOT* go with glue in shell because that usually needs lots of > > complex data structures to simplify the code, otherwise you waste lots > > of time working around poor hash support to do it in shell... Pure > > shell would also not be my favorite tool to write the build system per > > se since tracking parallel tasks with it is more complex than with > > make/ninja or other tools meant for that. > > > > I'd agree with that as well, i wasn't proposing pure sh for the build system - just for requirements/option gathering. ala kconfig and what configure does today but far simpler (only the checks we need). -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
