on 6/18/2002 2:42 PM, D�nes Bogs�nyi at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have also �upgraded� or should it be �downgraded� to MacOS X and an > 800MHz G4 and I am rather less than overwhelmed. In fact i have had to > keep classic for a lot of my work. Printing is a real major problem > which has been very much downgraded. If I save something as pdf in > Preview and then try to print on a Laser II NT printer it just simply > will not print! the only option is to open in Acrobat 4.05. People I > send material as pdf report the same feature. > MacOS X is an order of magnitude less stable than MacOS 9 and freezes at > the drop of a hat and becomes unresponsive after about three days only > fixable by a restart if the Apple can be opened which it regularly can > not. > After about a month I still do not have full functionality and Support > is just plain not interested and has told me so.
I hear people say that Mac OS X is less stable, but for me it much more stable. Given my experience in the past in designing hardware and dealing with hardware and RAM issues, I would tend to suspect that the people who find Mac OS X "unstable" in comparison with Mac OS 9 should double-check their RAM. Mac OS 9 doesn't push the hardware as hard as Mac OS X, and so RAM that is questionable may work perfectly with Mac OS 9, but not work correctly with Mac OS X. -- Glenn L. Austin <>< Computer Wizard and Race Car Driver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.austin-home.com/glenn/> -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
