> do find the explanation from MS that implementing this would require 'a > non-trivial amount of work' to be somewhat amusing. After all, customers, are > paying a 'non-trivial' amount for the upgrade so it doesn't seem to be a > completely outlandish thing to ask for,
We get requests for a lot of non-outlandish things. The trick is to focus on the ones with the biggest impact. So far, there have been more impactful things for us to focus our resources on than this particular feature (especially given the several workaround offered up by our excellent MVPs). > especially when it's a matter of feature parity with the equivalent > product for Windows. Feature parity is a red herring. We would never implement a feature just for "parity". We'd do it if our customers would find it useful and valuable, and then only if it was more so than other things we could also do instead (opportunity cost). -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
