on 6/11/04 12:08 AM, Kirk McElhearn at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well, that's not very helpful, since my spam is probably different than > yours. I've found the spam filter in 2004 to be much less effective than in > v. X. What has changed?
That's interesting. I find it to be 100 times better at identifying spam. I couldn't use v.X's spam filter at all. I was using SpamSieve in v.X but now I use 2004's spam filter set to "High" only. What do you have your spam filter set to? -Charlie -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
