On 6/12/04 5:18 PM, "Charlie Fritzius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, that's not very helpful, since my spam is probably different than
>> yours. I've found the spam filter in 2004 to be much less effective than in
>> v. X. What has changed?
>
> That's interesting. I find it to be 100 times better at identifying spam. I
> couldn't use v.X's spam filter at all. I was using SpamSieve in v.X but now
> I use 2004's spam filter set to "High" only.
>
> What do you have your spam filter set to?
High.
Kirk
Co-author of Microsoft Office v. X Inside Out
http://www.mcelhearn.com/insideout.html
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.mcelhearn.com . . . . . .
. . Kirk McElhearn | Chemin de la Lauze | 05600 Guillestre | France . .
--
To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
