On 8/23/04 2:51 AM, "SVEN AERTS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's have a look: yes you're rigtht must be one of them ... So now I > reactualise half of them to pinpoint if the corrrupt rule in that half or > the other till I poinpoint the corrupte rule? Sometimes you can spot the problem, but the method you describe above would be the best choice especially if you have a lot of rules. -- Diane -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
