Steve-
Sadly enough, American Forests initially accepts Biltmore stick-ed heights...as 
a quick estimate to assess consideration, it would be fine with me, but I'd be 
inclined to asterisk it for future visit, particularly if it were a fellow ENT 
who just happened to have only a Stick along...
-Don

> Subject: [ENTS] Re: Tree Measurement Data Spreadsheet
> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:44:38 -0500
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> 
> 
> Guys,
> 
> Points taken; as the younger generation says, "my bad!"  At first
> glance, I thought the spreadsheet was enabling the measurer to record
> the measurements with either a clinometer or range finder depending on
> what he/she may have; perhaps "double-checking" with range finders of
> potential champs as Don has noted. 
> 
> I suppose a Biltmore Stick is out of the question (tongue in cheek)!
> 
> Steve Springer
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Edward Frank
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 4:30 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ENTS] Re: Tree Measurement Data Spreadsheet
> 
> Don,
>  
> I do not want the data if it is measured using a clinometer at a certain
> distance from the base.  Less data that is accurate is preferable to
> lots of data that incorporates unacceptable errors.  The trees can be
> measured using a laser & clinometer sin/top sine/bottom  method,  by
> pole measurements, or by climbs and tape drops.  Some combinations of
> these are fine.  We can not accept clinometer at a set distance
> measurements into the dataset or it is useless for the purposes we
> desire.  I don't trust data collected that way even if the measurer is
> meticulous in how it is collected, no matter who they may be.
>  
> Ed
> 
>       ----- Original Message ----- 
>       From: DON BERTOLETTE <mailto:[email protected]>  
>       To: [email protected] 
>       Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:22 PM
>       Subject: [ENTS] Re: Tree Measurement Data Spreadsheet
> 
>       Steve-
>       One of things we've discussed relative to data collection is
> that we're pretty much happy to have as many measurers out there
> measuring their hearts out, using whatever equipment that is available
> to them, we just need to know what level of accuracy we'll expect based
> on their equipment...if they're truly champion contenders, more accurate
> equipment, teams would be brought to bear.
>       Until the laser rangefinders drop in price some more, so that
> more folks can afford them, the wily clinometer user can extract fairly
> good data, under a certain range of conditions, which get explored in
> Will's measurement tome.
>       Good point!
>       -Don
>       
>       
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 

_________________________________________________________________
Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to