J> Thanks, I think I haven't given the longer lens as much
J> consideration as I generally work in the shorter focal lengths.
J> The 70 - 200 is on my 'dream' list though.
J> My biggest consternation is about whether to keep the 28 - 105 and
J> diversify, or if I should replace it with the 28 -70.
Hello Jim,
I would recommend testing the 28-70 before buying it.
Do a side-by-side test with your 28-105 and decide if it is
really worth it. In your position I would either choose a tele
(200/2.8L) or the macro as they would extend your possibilities
more. If you can spend the extra bucks the 70-200 2.8L is of
course a very good choice (but heavier).
--
Best regards,
Dieter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
