Karen Nakamura wrote:
> Have you thought about the 28-70 or 24-70mm f/2.8 L lenses? > > I have the 28-135 IS but was a bit disappointed in its softness. I > got a 28-70mm L lens for a reasonably good price and am happy/er. > > I also just bought a 16-35mm f/2.8 L lens and am excited to test it > out on my 10D. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Karen It depends on your criteria. Many photogs I have met take a digital image and then crop a tiny piece of that image and blow it up for comparison. While this will show one lens sharper than the other, so what! This is far from real world. My 28-135mm is great. Maybe not as tack sharp as a 24-70mm F2.8L (have they fixed the focus ring coming apart yet?), but it works for me and I typically go to 8x10 and on occasion 11x14. Sharp, clear and that is all I care about. Peter K * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
