On Tuesday August 10 2004 8:19 am, James B.Davis wrote: > I just looked at Photodo's ratings of the 28-70 and the 28-135 side by > side. In the mid range of focal lengths, there is literally no > difference in the sharpness of the two. I know many of you will > challenge this, but that's what it says. The former is a bit sharper > at 70, but then again it doesn't go to 135, which is where the later's > rating falls down a bit. I think many people are victims of hype about > this lens. I have heard plenty of Pros who use the 28-135 all the > time.
You're right, I have to challenge it. Like some other pubs.....they mess up frequently. Yes, the 28-135 is nice - Pros often use it for portraits as it's a little soft. Fred -- "Running Windows on a Pentium is like getting a Porsche but only being able to drive it in reverse with the handbrake on." * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
