On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Bryan J Smith <b.j.sm...@ieee.org> wrote:
> Q: > Do you understand the purpose of RHSCL PR EPEL? ;) > > You want RHEL, but neither RHSCL nor EPEL is it, nor designed to be it. > > That's why I said ... > > EPEL's ideal aimpoint, when feasible, should be like RHSCL. ;) > SCL is for parallel installable packages that already exist in the system (i.e. newer versions of gcc/Postgres/Python/etc). Some EPEL packages also provide that sort of thing (like the old cmake28 packages), but I don't believe that EPEL as a whole is aiming to do that more than just provide packages that aren't available in EL.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
