- The Special Theory of Relativity. ==========================.. It began in 1905 when Einstein created SRT, (theory of photon/electron’s behaviour). Minkowski, tried to understand SRT using 4D space. Poor young Einstein, reading Minkowski interpretation, said, that now he couldn’t understand his own theory. “ Einstein, you are right, it is difficult to understand SRT using 4D space. But it is possible using my 5D space" - said Kaluza in 1921. This theory was tested and found insufficient. "Well", said another mathematicians, - "maybe 6D, 7D, 8D, 9D spaces will explain it". And they had done it. But the doubts still remain. "OK", they say, "we have only one way to solve this problem. We must create more complex D spaces". And they do it, they use all their power, all their super intellects to solve this problem. Glory to these mathematicians !!!! But………. But there is one problem. To create new D space, mathematicians must add a new parameter. It is impossible to create new D space without a new parameter. And the mathematicians take this parameter arbitrarily (it fixed according to his opinion, not by objective rules). # The physicist, R. Lipin explained this situation in such way: "Give me three parameters and I can fit an elephant. With four I can make him wiggle his trunk…" To this Lipin’s opinion it is possible to add: "with one more parameter the elephant will fly." The mathematicians sell and we buy these theories. Where are our brains? ===============. The SRT is a real theory. But " 4-D Minkowski space " is an abstract theory. Minkowski's mathematic theory has nothing to do with physics, with the Nature. There isn't any proof of its existence. And if we mix these two theories then we are surprised with its paradox. What does the man usually do in such situation? It is clear, he must understand what “ 4-D Minkowski space " is. I say, it is Vacuum. But somebody can say: “ You are wrong, 4-D Minkowski space is only a part of 11-D space.” Maybe this argument is correct. Then we must suppose that the 11-D space will be a part of some 47-D space in 50 years. And who knows where its end is. Perhaps in 123-D space the physicists will find the God there. And if we don't know what 1+1 = 2 how can we know what 5+4 = 9 ? And if we don't know what is 4-D negative space ( 4-D positive Minkowski space ) how can we understand 11-D space ( string theory) ? In another words, if we don’t know what “ 4-D Minkowski space " is, so it is impossible to take SRT as a finished one. The proof of SRT isn’t over yet. We must give a real interpretation to “ 4-D Minkowski space ". I only hope that a simple, usual logic will help a man to understand its essence. ======. ========= If I were a king, I would publish a law: every mathematician who takes part in the creation of 4D space and higher is to be awarded a medal "To the winner over common sense". Why? Because they have won us over using the absurd ideas of Minkowski and Kaluza. ==============.. I think this 4-D negative space is a real one. I think this space is Vacuum. Why? 1.“ Minkowski space “ has no gravity field, but has negative parameter. 2. Only pure Vacuum space has no gravity but has negative parameter : T= - 273= 0K. 3. The negative parameter is united with space/ time , which are joined together absolutely and this unit we can see in Vacuum . 4. And the second SRT postulate tells about constant moving light quanta in Vacuum. 5. It is impossible SRT to be the right theory and space around SRT to be an abstract theory. 6. If in our brain abstract and real ideas are mixed together then the interpretation of physics must be paradoxical. ====== ====== P.S. Sorry. I forgot that all Universe began from " apparent big bang ". So I must add the " apparent big bang " to " D-space" …………..or to " the God "...................... Then ............... The atheist will say : " There isn’t any God. There is only big band which destroyed all “D- spaces” and therefore we see background radiation T=2,7K now." And religious man will say: " The God exists. He sits at his “ D- home” and plays with all things. For example. The action, when the God compresses all Universe into his palm, we have named " a singular point". And action, when the God opens his palm, we have named the "Big Bang". I don’t know who is right. But I came to conclusion: " If I, as a peasant, think like modern physicists, I will never gather my harvest . " ======= ======.. If mathematician makes a small mistake in the beginning of his calculations then after some operations it grows into a big one. And if in the beginning of sciences birth (Newton ) the abstract ideas were put into its fundament , then now we are surprised with its paradoxes……… ……………………….. and we can create new and new theories for 1000 years but the result will be the same - paradoxical. ============ . . Best wishes. Israel Sadovnik. Socratus. ==========================.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
