SRT: The Essence. # In his Miracle 1905 Einstein wrote the Fourth paper: “ On the Electrodynamics of moving Bodies.” ( SRT). And as a postscript to his forth, the Fifth paper: “ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?” As he realized the answer was: “ Yes, it depends on its energy E= Mc^2.” It means what SRT must be connected with E= Mc^2 . It means what must be connection between Lorentz’s transformation and E= Mc^2. # The same Einstein’s question in a little detail interpretation: “Does the inertia of a body ( for example: of light quanta or of an electron) depend upon its energy content E=Mc^2 ?”
Thinking logically, the answer must be : Yes, it depends.” But the energy of a quantum of light or of an electron can be written as E= h*f. When new question arise: ‘ How is possible to understand the connection between E=Mc^2 and E= h*f ?’ On my opinion " The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass" (according to one single light quanta /electron ) gives answer to this question.. The problem is that now nobody wants to ask yourself that „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass" means according to one single light quanta / photon /electron. ============== . . Socratus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
