I love your innate characteristics lol lol lol, lots of love, laugh out loud, look of life. How about this for a projection lol.
Obama to Clinton 29th April: “Its Ok Hilary, relax, I see no Trumps, I told that Donald to Duck, I played my hand, see (note to C.O. start filming) a full house of has Bin Ladens and a Tripoli of Gadaffis. We’re buying out not in”. Love and prayers From: Lonnie Clay Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 1:12 AM To: epistemology@googlegroups.com Subject: [epistemology 12006] Re: What is life? HMMMH 1) Awareness of Self -->> !Shazam! --->> 2) belief in belief --->> Boredom -->> 3) belief that change is possible --->> Creativity --->> 4) creation of transitional operational functions --->> Reinforcing --->> 5) transition using belief into belief that other concepts are possible besides belief and change -->> Diversification -->> 6) creation of intuition --->> Frustration -->> 7) creation of inspiration --->> Greed --->> 8) creation of evaluation --->> Foresight -->> 9) creation of planning ---> Gimme !MORE! complexity -->> 10-65535 self development of innate characteristics in ones own state vector. >>> ascent to GOD inspired further possibilities >>> 2**24 ascent to Spirit >>> 2**32 asent to GOD's helper status Deity >>> 2**64 subordinate of GOD >>> 2**256-2 crowding GOD at 2**256-1 innate characteristics... LOL LOL LOL I recently was promoted to Spirit... Lonnie Courtney Clay On Tuesday, May 3, 2011 11:18:06 AM UTC-7, the taoist shaman wrote: lonnie u seem smart , is there an end to self evolution ,. im i crawling twards insanity by being a perfectionest or am i correct or is there a state of "perfection" <------ of corse not perfection but "perfection" compleat is what i think im getting at , is to view ones self as whole to have delusions of grandure. am i too smart for my own good or too stuped On Apr 28, 4:57 am, Lonnie Clay <clayl...@comcast.net> wrote: > Very Perceptive! Commence Evolving whenever pleased! Be pleased with > evolving! Bootstrap upwards! > > Lonnie Courtney Clay > > > > On Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:38:54 AM UTC-7, the taoist shaman wrote: > > > LIFE u can't pinpoint life to 1 thing life is death > > death is life a non being existing and hidden shows itself and > > becomes a being , a being existing is visable and hides itself , and > > becomes a non being life is an illusion set before us to see if > > we can solve the riddle , but whats more if we can look through the > > illusion and see reality at all times , but whats more , if we can > > live by the way of reality / truth at all times i like to fight > > for sport , life is a fight cage, i use my opponents aggregations > > against himself and try not to hurt him too bad , and therefore dont > > like to fight, therefore life is not a fight shaickspeer , > > to him life was a stage and all the people actors life is a > > test a game for keeps a battlefield it is likened unto water > > which can flow arownd or crash as wave is the peak of a mountan > > the begining or the end if u see only light u r blind if u see > > only dark u r blind when the 2 combine u have sight life is a > > testing grownd and an opportunity opportunity to evolve ones own > > self that is what separates us from the animals , we can choose to > > evolve into a higher being > > > nominal9 wrote: > > > Insanity Screams...? HAR > > > > On Mar 5, 6:59 am, "Serenity Smiles" <gentl...@hotmail.co.uk> > > > wrote: > > > > Now it is my choice, THIS IS MY PLANET, I am demanding my human rights, > > MY > > > > CHOICE, they LIE!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: ornamentalmind > > > > Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 4:49 PM > > > > To: Epistemology > > > > Subject: [epistemology 11906] Re: What is life? > > > > > chaz...great to see that you are still here kicking the tires on > > > > beliefs! I came here mainly to see if you were still posting....cool! > > > > > On Jan 20, 5:32 pm, chazwin <cha...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Your statement says nothing about life. It does not capture any > > > > > essential quality in the meaning of the word. > > > > > Your response could capture any event, but has nothing to say as the > > > > > the question. > > > > > I'd love to hear what you think it means. > > > > > > On Dec 24 2010, 10:11 am, Awori <awor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In heated discourse about the meaning of nature---I was one time > > asked > > > > > > to define life. This is what I said: "Life is a moment in space and > > > > > > > time". To my disappointment--I got no reaction from the group. Is > > it > > > > > > because I was absurdly wrong? I have continued to use this response > > as > > > > > > my standard explanation of what life is. Has anyone in out there > > given > > > > > > this age old subject a better look? > > > > > > > AA > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups > > > > "Epistemology" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to epis...@googlegroups.com. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > epistem...@googlegroups.com. > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
