If given a choice, I would take simple pleasure in life itself, living a carefree existence as a HOBOH. However, I need to get up off my lazy butt and do some things which are so valuable that (even given away for free) they result in voluntary donations to my PayPal account from those better off than I. HINTNIH - PayPal account claylon...@comcast.net - my income is $985 per month veteran's disability pension (judged insane), and I am a year of income into indebtedness... Beggers CAN'T BE CHOOSERS - IT's my choice to be a HOBOH, but I suspect that I will feel obliged to work even harder than I was working while employed if my begging results in some generous donations... When employed I worked 60 to 80 hours per week on average, often all overtime being uncompensated rather than paid by my employer. Lately I have been on the computer interfaced with the internet from 12-14 hours per day, 7 days per week. I COULD increase that rate to 16-18 hours per day...
I recommend that you should read the book titled "Trample an empire down" by Mack Reynolds to see what a leisure driven society would be like... Lonnie Courtney Clay On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 1:44:55 AM UTC-7, Serenity Smiles wrote: > > 2. Belief in belief = Boredom, How true, my friend, everyone buys > into the evolution to make things faster and easier Mr. Bibendum (the > Michelin man). But when people realise that with the evolution of progress > comes less jobs, less need, less people then, gulp, we are all on the path > to redundancy unless your path is one born to privelage of chance. So what > are you going to do?? What will you teach your children you adore to > procreate. Would you want to share if you had it all?? Human nature is a > funny thing. > > *From:* Lonnie Clay > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 04, 2011 1:12 AM > *To:* episte...@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* [epistemology 12006] Re: What is life? > > HMMMH > > 1) Awareness of Self -->> !Shazam! --->> > 2) belief in belief --->> Boredom -->> > 3) belief that change is possible --->> Creativity --->> > 4) creation of transitional operational functions --->> Reinforcing --->> > 5) transition using belief into belief that other concepts are possible > besides belief and change -->> Diversification -->> > 6) creation of intuition --->> Frustration -->> > 7) creation of inspiration --->> Greed --->> > 8) creation of evaluation --->> Foresight -->> > 9) creation of planning ---> Gimme !MORE! complexity -->> > 10-65535 self development of innate characteristics in ones own state > vector. > >>> ascent to GOD inspired further possibilities > >>> 2**24 ascent to Spirit > >>> 2**32 asent to GOD's helper status Deity > >>> 2**64 subordinate of GOD > >>> 2**256-2 crowding GOD at 2**256-1 innate characteristics... LOL LOL LOL > I recently was promoted to Spirit... > > Lonnie Courtney Clay > > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011 11:18:06 AM UTC-7, the taoist shaman wrote: >> >> lonnie u seem smart , is there an end to self evolution ,. im i >> crawling twards insanity by being a perfectionest or am i correct or >> is there a state of "perfection" <------ of corse not perfection but >> "perfection" compleat is what i think im getting at , is to view ones >> self as whole to have delusions of grandure. am i too smart for my >> own good or too stuped >> >> On Apr 28, 4:57 am, Lonnie Clay <clay...@comcast.net> wrote: >> > Very Perceptive! Commence Evolving whenever pleased! Be pleased with >> > evolving! Bootstrap upwards! >> > >> > Lonnie Courtney Clay >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:38:54 AM UTC-7, the taoist shaman wrote: >> > >> > > LIFE u can't pinpoint life to 1 thing life is death >> > > death is life a non being existing and hidden shows itself and >> > > becomes a being , a being existing is visable and hides itself , and >> >> > > becomes a non being life is an illusion set before us to see if >> > > we can solve the riddle , but whats more if we can look through the >> > > illusion and see reality at all times , but whats more , if we can >> > > live by the way of reality / truth at all times i like to fight >> > > for sport , life is a fight cage, i use my opponents aggregations >> > > against himself and try not to hurt him too bad , and therefore dont >> > > like to fight, therefore life is not a fight shaickspeer , >> >> > > to him life was a stage and all the people actors life is a >> > > test a game for keeps a battlefield it is likened unto water >> > > which can flow arownd or crash as wave is the peak of a mountan >> >> > > the begining or the end if u see only light u r blind if u see >> > > only dark u r blind when the 2 combine u have sight life is a >> >> > > testing grownd and an opportunity opportunity to evolve ones own >> > > self that is what separates us from the animals , we can choose to >> >> > > evolve into a higher being >> > >> > > nominal9 wrote: >> > > > Insanity Screams...? HAR >> > >> > > > On Mar 5, 6:59 am, "Serenity Smiles" <gent...@hotmail.co.uk> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > Now it is my choice, THIS IS MY PLANET, I am demanding my human >> rights, >> > > MY >> > > > > CHOICE, they LIE!!!!!!!!!!! >> > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > From: ornamentalmind >> > > > > Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 4:49 PM >> > > > > To: Epistemology >> > > > > Subject: [epistemology 11906] Re: What is life? >> > >> > > > > chaz...great to see that you are still here kicking the tires on >> > > > > beliefs! I came here mainly to see if you were still >> posting....cool! >> > >> > > > > On Jan 20, 5:32 pm, chazwin <cha...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> > > > > > Your statement says nothing about life. It does not capture any >> > > > > > essential quality in the meaning of the word. >> > > > > > Your response could capture any event, but has nothing to say as >> the >> > > > > > the question. >> > > > > > I'd love to hear what you think it means. >> > >> > > > > > On Dec 24 2010, 10:11 am, Awori <awo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > In heated discourse about the meaning of nature---I was one >> time >> > > asked >> > > > > > > to define life. This is what I said: "Life is a moment in >> space and >> > >> > > > > > > time". To my disappointment--I got no reaction from the group. >> Is >> > > it >> > > > > > > because I was absurdly wrong? I have continued to use this >> response >> > > as >> > > > > > > my standard explanation of what life is. Has anyone in out >> there >> > > given >> > > > > > > this age old subject a better look? >> > >> > > > > > > AA >> > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> > > Groups >> > > > > "Epistemology" group. >> > > > > To post to this group, send email to epi...@googlegroups.com. >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > > epist...@googlegroups.com. >> > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// >> > > groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > epistemology...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
