Maths (beyond my practice) does consider different sizes of infinity - to me it's never been more than something handy to be cancelled out in equations and a bugger if any are left over - normalisation, re- normalisation and so on. Solutions to infinite regresses were proposed - don't know if they worked, but do remember I failed completely trying to work with them in knowledge justification. Economic systems throw up at lot of externalities - stuff excluded to make the sums work - usually at the expense of indigenous settlers etc. This is more like hiding horse dung or bodies under the carpet. I don't link any of these guesses in physics to god-search Socratus - the hologenome of biology helps define what a human being is (potentially questioning 'I' and certainly individualism) - but I still see no god search, though some feeling of presence of a collective wider than we normally think. Scientists don't reject god as scientists - just god thinking in trying to work out their systems. I would seek a fellowship in which god was unspoken (no need).
On Jan 30, 12:50 pm, awori achoka <awori.ach...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure enough--we shouldn't have the answer--since the externality that > defines us is unknown > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:40 PM, socratus <socra...@bezeqint.net> wrote: > > About Infinity. / My opinion / > > How could mere man comprehend infinity? > > ==. > > Infinity is the cause of the crisis in Physics. > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity > > > Why is Infinity the cause of the crisis in Physics? > > Because we don’t know what infinity is. > > The concept of infinite / eternal means nothing to a scientists. > > Infinity is no ‘more ‘, ‘ less’, ‘equally’ or ‘similar’. > > The Infinity is something that could not be compared to anything. > > Considering so, scientists came to conclusion that the > > infinity cannot be considered in real processes and they > > proclaimed unwritten law: > > ‘ If we want that the theory would be correct, > > the infinity should be eliminated’ . . . . by the > > ' method of renormalization ' . . . about which Feynman wrote > > ' using this method we can these infinities sweep under a carpet ' > > and then Feynman asked: > > ‘ Who can confirm that the infinity conforms with reality of nature?’ > > / Book: The Character of Physical Law. Lecture 7. / > > ===. > > > I will try to explain ‘infinity’ as brief and simple as is possible. > > =. > > There are billions and billions Galaxies in the > > Universe, each of which has hundreds of billions of stars. > > All these billions and billions Galaxies are divided by space, > > which we call ‘ Vacuum’. > > This Vacuum is an infinite and eternal continuum. > > Why Vacuum is infinite ? > > Because the sum of masses of all Galaxies (the cosmological > > constant / the critical density ) is as small that it cannot > > ‘ close’ the whole Universe into sphere and therefore Universe > > as whole must be ‘open’, endless, infinite. > > Only in some small local parts of this infinite Vacuum continuum > > some masses can gather together in an enough quantity to create > > stars, planets . . .etc. > > Vacuum continuum is not a simple space > > Physicists say that in vacuum ‘virtual particles’ exist and they > > can appear as real particles. Nobody knows what they are. > > Astrophysicists say that ‘dark mass- matter’ in vacuum is hidden. > > This ‘dark mass- matter’ is not ordinary matter but ‘non normal’. > > They say that more than 90% of the matter in the Universe > > is ‘non normal dark mass – matter’. > > So, from ‘ virtual particles ‘ and ‘non normal dark matter ’ were > > created all billion and billion Galaxies, including our planet Earth > > and everything on it, also including you, who reads this email. > > And because we don’t know what ‘ virtual particles ‘ and ‘dark matter’ > > are, > > therefore we don’t have answer to the question: who am I ? > > ====.. > > Best wishes. > > Israel Sadovnik Socratus > > ===.. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Epistemology" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. > > Visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
