On Nov 17, 2011, at 3:17 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote: >>> obj with { foo: 12 } with { bar: 13 } with { baz: 17 } > > I like the idea! As it is syntactically different in this role, errors should > be easy to spot. > > But I think `with` “points in the wrong direction” (object `obj` *with* > prototype `proto`). That is, to me, it suggests a pointer going from > prototype to object.
Well, ultimately the directionality is arbitrary. In my proposal it's "prototype `obj` *with* instance `blah`". This results in LTR whereas the other way ends up RTL. JS is built around English, so LTR seems more appropriate (with all due sympathy to our Hebrew-speaking programmers!). > The above example demonstrates just how well the <| operator works. The main > objection to it is that it looks wrong in some fonts? Unless there is a > general grawlix objection, something arrow-y would be great. Every font I ever see it in looks terrible, and there is a general grawlix objection. This is largely an aesthetic thing, but aesthetics matter and people react very strongly against <| or funky Unicode symbols. (The latter just ain't gonna happen.) > Is there a list of symbols that have already been rejected? Seeing the > preposition “with", I feel like suggesting “of” (prototype `proto` *of* > object `obj`), but I think that has been rejected before (and is taken by the > for loop). > > obj of { foo: 12 } of { bar: 13 } of { baz: 17 } We're already using `of` for a different purpose (for-of), and it just reads wrong here. Dave
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss