Yeah, I'd like them. I just thought it is no point suggesting.
Norbert Lindenberg wrote:
A few others relevant to EcmaScript:
=== ⩶
Why not ≡ (to match !==). It has also better meaning.
!= ≠
!== ≢
... …
! ¬
* ×
/ ÷
Yes! I'd like to see the last two (not is nice, too), to split it from
other meanings of / and *.
&& ∧
|| ∨
in ∈
== ≈
!== ≉
(and just for fun:
for ∀
if ∃
though I think that the first would work :-) )
Infinity ∞
sqrt √
cbrt ∛
PI π
Intl 🌐 // requires better fonts
(http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f310/)
Besides typing, legibility is critical: ⇒, ≥, ≤ are clearly
improvements over their ASCII counterparts, but ≠ and ≢ are too hard
to tell apart.
I think there should be not ≠ (!== is anyway not very good to use, one
should favor !===) only ≡ and ≢ for === and !===.
Norbert
On Apr 4, 2012, at 22:23 , Brendan Eich wrote:
From http://www.scala-lang.org/node/4723 (hat tip *Corey
Farwell*@*frewsxcv*<https://twitter.com/#%21/frewsxcv>
*
):
=> ⇒ // implemented
<- ← // implemented
-> → // implemented
== ⩵
>> ≫
<< ≪
>>> ⋙
For these three I am concerned with meaning... it should be neither
"French quotes" nor "much greater/lesser than".
>= ≥
<= ≤
:: ∷
Corey suggested editors could do the input conversion when users type the
digraph. If Scala can go here, why not JS?
/be
Herby
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
