On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Adam Shannon <a...@ashannon.us> wrote:
> I don't see anything inherently wrong with adding some nice sugar to > ES, because the people who will be using this "math heavy" notation > will be those who are used to it. The "everyday" ecmascript programmer > probably won't touch these because they might add extra work for them. > Plus, it'd be nice to be able to read math in ES (for us math oriented > folk). So what about people editing code written by others? Will they have to run the source through some transformation tool to get the ASCII operators back? -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
