On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Erik Arvidsson <erik.arvids...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Geoffrey Sneddon <gsned...@opera.com> > wrote: > > As such, I'm somewhat dubious as to whether we can actually change the > > format that much without breaking sites. For reference, we support > > Error.stack (supposedly identical to SpiderMonkey in format, though > > obviously not) and Error.stacktrace (which is meant to actually be human > > readable). Originally, we had Error.stacktrace as Error.stack, but it > just > > broke too much (we spoof UA on some Google sites by default, and have to > > choose whether to go down IE/Fx/WK code-path, and often all three rely > upon > > non-standard behaviour). > > > > [1]: > > > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/releases/2.4/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/impl/StackTraceCreator.java > > This looks pretty broken to me as is. It does not seem to work correct > for the V8 style formatting that is used by Chrome and IE. > Note that GWT uses deferred binding to substitute browser-specific implementations for the version being compiled -- see http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/releases/2.4/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/CoreWithUserAgent.gwt.xml where the mappings are defined. So, for Chrome, CollectorChrome is used instead of Collector. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
