Kevin, although I agree that ES6 modules are well-designed, I don't think the checkpoint that we did last week was a mistake, in fact, we invited implementers of the polyfills and transpilers to share their concerns and questions, to help us to correct course, that's all it was.
Saying that the `moduleImport` syntax was not confusing and we should not change it is just saying that TC39 is not open for feedback, there is a clear problem with that, and you can see it in the way people are trying to use it, (e.g.: http://normalize.github.io/#transformations, check the way those folks are using the imported module as a function), and believe me, there are many more people using it wrong, because it is just confusing, that's all. we see this very often when people are asking questions during trainings/workshops and opening bugs for the transpilers and polyfills. The question is, what are we going to do about it? /caridy On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Kevin Smith <zenpars...@gmail.com> wrote: > Everyone just needs to chill out - ES6 modules are well-designed (thanks > to Sam and Dave and Andreas and maybe myself a little ; ) and they are > going to work extremely well in the field. > > The message needs to be that modules are *done*. Period. (Minus some > minor cosmetic issues, perhaps.) Opening up this can of worms at the last > TC39 meeting was a big mistake. > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
