*> There is no such thing as ES7.*
You say that as though you can control how people index language versions
in their minds...
On 1 June 2016 at 23:33, Mark S. Miller <erig...@google.com> wrote:
> ES2015 was the last version for which the short for ("ES6") was also in
> common use. After that, there is only ES2016 etc. There is no such thing as
> ES7.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:03 PM, John Gardner <gardnerjo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to propose a simple yet potent syntax addition
>> <https://esdiscuss.org/topic/constructing-objects-from-named-identifiers>
>> for /ECMAScript\d+/. What's the most direct approach to get this
>> officially considered? I've seen differing procedures mentioned in places
>> and I'm unsure.
>>
>> BTW, am I the only one getting confused by the year-based naming
>> convention? I skip over intermediate letters when reading and only absorb
>> the last digit, which makes me mistake ES2017 as ES7, which is actually
>> ES2016, which I get mixed up with ES6, which is ES2015.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> --MarkM
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
