I haven't seen anyone referring to ES2017 as ES8, so I imagine we won't have this problem anymore in a couple years. In anyway, this is an addition that won't happen to ES2016, it's too late for that.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:36 AM, John Gardner <gardnerjo...@gmail.com> wrote: > *> There is no such thing as ES7.* > > You say that as though you can control how people index language versions > in their minds... > > On 1 June 2016 at 23:33, Mark S. Miller <erig...@google.com> wrote: > >> ES2015 was the last version for which the short for ("ES6") was also in >> common use. After that, there is only ES2016 etc. There is no such thing as >> ES7. >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:03 PM, John Gardner <gardnerjo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I'd like to propose a simple yet potent syntax addition >>> <https://esdiscuss.org/topic/constructing-objects-from-named-identifiers> >>> for /ECMAScript\d+/. What's the most direct approach to get this >>> officially considered? I've seen differing procedures mentioned in places >>> and I'm unsure. >>> >>> BTW, am I the only one getting confused by the year-based naming >>> convention? I skip over intermediate letters when reading and only absorb >>> the last digit, which makes me mistake ES2017 as ES7, which is actually >>> ES2016, which I get mixed up with ES6, which is ES2015. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> es-discuss@mozilla.org >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> --MarkM >> > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss