I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big mental hurdle to getting started. Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
I did figure out the .net 4.0 part. Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path would have saved a lot of grief Sent from my iPhone On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Martin Veith <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Scott, > > thanks for your reply. > >> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should >> be called out? >> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to >> validate? > According to http://apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#sha-checksum the use > of SHA-1 should be avoided. > Therefore we used SHA512. We will add this note to the download page of the > website as soon as the release is out. > Information and examples hot to verify the release signatures and check sums > can be found on the website too. > >> the ant build of example\helloworld works. >> the java version of example\helloworld works. >> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error >> code. > Since the integration of the UDP Transport layer the C# build has had > dependencies to the .NET 4.0 framework. > In order to build the examples the location of the framework must be in your > path. > This information is also available in the Readme file of each example. > Maybe that's the reason of your obscure error? > > As this dependency to .NET 4.0 is caused only by a used implementation of a > BlockingQueue we are thinking about to eliminate this for the next release > and so come back to .NET 2.0 compatibility. > >> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should >> be. > As in the previous 1.1.0-release C examples are only available for > example_mixin and helloworld. > The C examples are not build by the ant build script in the binary releases > because we don't ship the ant-cmake library. > Therefore you have to call cmake manually as described in the Readme file too. > > Cheers, > Martin > > -----Original Message----- > From: scott comer [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 22:05 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages > > because of the no c version of examples, i vote: > > -1 > > scott > > On 12/15/2011 2:52 PM, scott comer wrote: >> trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1: >> >> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should >> be called out? >> >> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to >> validate? >> >> installation verified. >> >> the ant build of example\helloworld works. >> the java version of example\helloworld works. >> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error >> code. >> >> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should >> be. >> >> scott out >> >> On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote: >>> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far. >>> >>> so +1 from my side >>> >>> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please >>> review it! >>> >>> Thanks >>> Michael >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49 >>> An:[email protected] >>> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages >>> >>> +1 from me >>> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martin >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18 >>> To:[email protected] >>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> >>> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of >>> Apache Etch. >>> >>> All files are currently placed in the following directory at >>> >>> >>> >>> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the >>> README.txt and >>> >>> BUILD.txt files. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please vote for this release package: >>> >>> >>> >>> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good >>> >>> [ ] +0 Don't care >>> >>> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of... >>> >>> >>> >>> This vote will run for 72 hours. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks for your votes, >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> Martin >> >> >
